Skip to main content

About Me

My photo
Natalie
My name is Natalie, I started this blog as a Newly Qualified Social Worker working with adults. I have now progressed to a level 3 Social Worker and want to continue sharing my experiences.

Sexual Orientation, Pronouns and Sexuality

 

As I am sure you are aware it is pride month and I was having an interesting conversation the other day about how we bring up topics such as sexual orientation, pronouns, gender identity and sexuality with the people we support. As I have mentioned in previous blogs the cases I work on in my team are predominantly older people and I think some people feel uncomfortable asking the people we support these types of questions.

As part of our work we update the system with equality monitoring information and one of the questions asked is about sexual orientation. I have seen people complete this part of the questionnaire without actually checking that the information they are inputting is correct. I believe that what happens on a lot of occasions are people get a history from the person who talks about their marriage and an assumption is made about their sexual orientation. Just because someone ends up married to someone of the opposite sex this does not necessarily mean that they are heterosexual but this is what people base it on.

The difficulty that can come with having conversations around this topic is that a lot of the people we support have lived through a time where being gay was either illegal or a mental illness. They may feel that they do not want to share that information due to repercussions that could happen to them. Especially for someone with Dementia who is potentially living in a time where that is the case in their memory. It may be that the family don't even know this information about them because they have not felt comfortable to tell them. This would mean that part of their identity is lost because they either cannot or will not share that with us.

We are creating a document to be completed to give a picture of someone at a glance in one place. We put pronouns down on this form and this sparked a discussion about whether we thought that some of the people we work with would understand what we were asking. We support a lot of people with Dementia so conversations may need to be kept fairly simple so that they can understand so is this something that should be included? Or do we base the way we refer to them on what family or friends tell us.

This lead the conversation to the topic of sexuality in terms of wanting to have sex or sexual contact with someone else. We work with people in care homes a lot of the time and I think the assumption that can happen is that when people reach a certain age they no longer have an interest in sex any more so do not offer any support around it.

Is this viewed this way because of our own beliefs and prejudices? I often say to people about certain decisions a person makes, if they were younger would this be an issue? Why should it be any different when it comes to sex or exploring their sexual orientation. We forgot that the urge doesn't necessarily just go away because you are older.

The difficulty that can arise in situations like this is that we educate younger people on the importance of using protection both to prevent pregnancy but also due to STD's. If we aren't having open conversations or supporting people how would we know that they may need condoms for example. They may think pregnancy is no longer a risk so we don't need to think about that but actually that could lead to STD's being spread.

You also have situations arise where someone with a Dementia diagnosis may no longer be able to consent to sex but the partner struggles to understand that it is no longer an option. That person may have been in that relationship for decades and always had a fairly active sex life now all of a sudden they are being told by external people they can no longer do so. This opens up the conversation about at what point are we impacting someone's human right to private and family life. We also have to protect the person who can no longer consent as it would be classed as sexual assault or rape.

We are in a place of privilege where people share a lot of their information, background and history with us and it is important that we treat that with the respect it deserves. We are there for that person regardless and we need to make sure that we are accurately detailing the information about them and not just assuming based on a small piece of information. We don't know what is going on for people and being supportive is the difference between them wanting to share or exclude us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Racism

The topic of this blog is going to be racism. As I am sure you can tell from the picture on my profile I am a white woman so I am not necessarily the best person to be writing about this topic but I wanted to give some musings following a recent conference I attended where the focus was all about racism. We did an activity to help us recognise our own privilege. I was sat with colleagues from multiple different cultures and countries. Throughout the activity I was completing my own but also watching how other people were responding to it. It was a list of scenarios or situations and if it was relevant to you then you had to add something to a bag. There was a list of approximately 25 statements. I think I added 6 to my bag but I watched as colleagues added easily double if not triple the amount that I did. I found that it made my heart feel heavy because although I know I have privilege for some aspects of my identity there are some aspects where I do not. I could see people speci...

History of Social Care

  So before I even start getting into this one I want to warn you that it won't be an easy read. I am going to reflect on a training session I went on recently and some of the information is harrowing and hard to hear so if that is not something you can handle right now feel free to click off completely or go find a different one of my blogs to read instead. The premise of this training course was looking at the history of Social Care and included discussions around asylums, the laws and legislations surrounding this that defined the terminology of the time and a conversation about Nazi Germany. The thing they all have in common is that they were looking at how people with disabilities were treated throughout history. We were shown a list of reasons that someone may be sent to an asylum or similar and I find it so interesting that one of the reasons you could be sent is for using medication to stop conception but it was enshrined in law that you could be forced to be sterili...

Sexual Violence and Coercion

I am going to start this blog like a lot of my recent ones with a trigger warning. This blog will discuss sexual violence, coercion and other related topics. If you do not feel you can read this then feel free to click off or find another one of my blogs to read. I went on a training course recently that was about sexual violence and coercion. Some of the discussions that happened in the training were really thought provoking, I have discussed this with Social Work colleagues since but also reflected on some of my own opinions, viewpoints and experiences. The first thing that is important to know before I talk about this topic further is the distinction between sexual violence and sexual coercion, sexual violence can happen to anyone and the perpetrator can be anyone whereas sexual coercion is when you know someone and it is a pattern or repetition of the behaviour. I think there are three main difficulties that can come with getting justice especially for sexual coercion which a...